The simpler way to leave LaunchDarkly without slowing releases.
BuildrFlags gives startup and scale-up teams the feature flag workflow they actually use, with flat pricing, built-in experiments, and a migration path that starts with one safe flag, not a risky platform rewrite.
Why teams switch
You do not need a big-bang migration
Start with one low-risk flag, run both systems in parallel, and switch only after the results match.
Pricing should not punish adoption
BuildrFlags keeps the core workflow simple with transparent monthly pricing instead of enterprise-style sprawl.
Your release workflow should stay fast
Targeting, scheduled releases, experiments, and signed webhooks stay available without adding product complexity.
Quick proof
Keep the release workflow, drop the enterprise tax.
If your team mainly uses flags for gradual rollout, targeting, kill switches, and a few experiments, the migration is usually a cleanup exercise. The hard part is confidence, so we make the rollout order and parallel-run path explicit.
Migration path
A practical five-step switch plan
- 1
Inventory your current LaunchDarkly flags and remove dead ones first.
- 2
Pick a low-risk release flag as the pilot migration.
- 3
Map targeting rules and default variations into BuildrFlags.
- 4
Run both systems in parallel until the evaluation output matches.
- 5
Cut over traffic, monitor, and remove old LaunchDarkly wiring after validation.
Best first pilot
Start with one visible but safe flag.
Good first candidates are onboarding copy, a beta feature, or a pricing-page treatment. Avoid your most business-critical billing or auth gate until the parallel run is proven.
What happens next
Use the migration guide for self-serve planning, then book a migration conversation if you want help mapping rules, choosing the pilot, or validating rollout order.